NSW · Hunter · Rural
Every development application and planning proposal lodged with Upper Hunter Shire Council, tracked daily from the NSW Planning Portal — and what share of it actually gets built.
Upper Hunter Shire Council determines a development application in a median of 35 days — 21 days faster than the NSW median of 56.
Measured across 138 determined development applications, last 12 months · 1,491 applications on record · 16 planning proposals · 14,394 people · 5,499 dwellings
Housing approved since 1 July 2024 · updated 15 Sept 2026
Counted from 172 of 370 determined applications — the ones stating a number of new homes, which for many of them is zero. The other 198 leave the field blank, and blank is not a zero.
9 homes are still waiting on a decision. This is every application lodged since 1 July 2024 and where it stands today — the homes figure beside it covers applications determined in the same period, which is a different set.
What kind of housing
5 smaller categories are not shown. An application can carry more than one type, so these do not sum to the total above.
NSW’s housing target
Outside the four target areas. Covered by the single 55,000-home regional NSW allocation, which NSW does not break down by council.
Approved is not built
An approval is not a house. Lodgd matches every application to the construction certificates that follow it, site by site, across all 128 councils — so the pipeline can be read as what is likely to exist rather than what was lodged.
Register your interest →Measured over 247,565 homes approved in the last 24 months.
Latest activity
Elsewhere in NSW
How we count. These figures count homes written on development applications and complying development certificates lodged with Upper Hunter Shire Council and published on the NSW Planning Portal. NSW’s Housing Supply Dashboard counts something different. Across NSW the two land within 6% of each other; council by council they differ by more than 20% about half the time, and in both directions — for some councils NSW’s figure is far higher, for others far lower. Ours is checked application by application against the Planning Portal itself, and matches it exactly in every council tested. Lodgd publishes what is in the applications, and says so rather than adjusting to match.